import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import warnings
'ignore')
warnings.filterwarnings(
%matplotlib inline
Recently, I had a chance to read an interesting WWW 2017 paper entitled: Neural Collaborative Filtering. The first paragraph of the abstract reads as follows:
In recent years, deep neural networks have yielded immense success on speech recognition, computer vision and natural language processing. However, the exploration of deep neural networks on recommender systems has received relatively less scrutiny. In this work, we strive to develop techniques based on neural networks to tackle the key problem in recommendation — collaborative filtering — on the basis of implicit feedback.
I’d recently written a blog post on using Keras (deep learning library) for implementing traditional matrix factorization based collaborative filtering. So, I thought to get my hands dirty with building a prototype for the paper mentioned above. The authors have already provided their code on Github, which should serve as a reference for the paper and not my post, whose purpose is merely educational!
Here’s how the proposed network architecture looks in the paper:
There are a few terms that we need to understand:
- User (u) and Item (i) are used to create embeddings (low-dimensional) for user and item
- Generalized Matrix Factorisation (GMF) combines the two embeddings using the dot product. This is our regular matrix factorisation.
- Multi-layer perceptron can also create embeddings for user and items. However, instead of taking a dot product of these to obtain the rating, we can concatenate them to create a feature vector which can be passed on to the further layers.
- Neural MF can then combine the predictions from MLP and GMF to obtain the following prediction.
As done in my previous post, I’ll use the MovieLens-100k dataset for illustration. Please refer to my previous post for more details.
Peak into the dataset
= pd.read_csv("/Users/nipun/Downloads/ml-100k/u.data",sep='\t',names="user_id,item_id,rating,timestamp".split(",")) dataset
dataset.head()
user_id | item_id | rating | timestamp | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 196 | 242 | 3 | 881250949 |
1 | 186 | 302 | 3 | 891717742 |
2 | 22 | 377 | 1 | 878887116 |
3 | 244 | 51 | 2 | 880606923 |
4 | 166 | 346 | 1 | 886397596 |
So, each record (row) shows the rating for a user, item (movie) pair. It should be noted that I use item and movie interchangeably in this post.
len(dataset.user_id.unique()), len(dataset.item_id.unique())
(943, 1682)
We assign a unique number between (0, #users) to each user and do the same for movies.
= dataset.user_id.astype('category').cat.codes.values
dataset.user_id = dataset.item_id.astype('category').cat.codes.values dataset.item_id
dataset.head()
user_id | item_id | rating | timestamp | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 195 | 241 | 3 | 881250949 |
1 | 185 | 301 | 3 | 891717742 |
2 | 21 | 376 | 1 | 878887116 |
3 | 243 | 50 | 2 | 880606923 |
4 | 165 | 345 | 1 | 886397596 |
Train test split
We’ll now split our dataset of 100k ratings into train (containing 80k ratings) and test (containing 20k ratings). Given the train set, we’d like to accurately estimate the ratings in the test set.
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
= train_test_split(dataset, test_size=0.2) train, test
train.head()
user_id | item_id | rating | timestamp | |
---|---|---|---|---|
13185 | 71 | 95 | 5 | 880037203 |
23391 | 144 | 509 | 4 | 882181859 |
90744 | 895 | 50 | 2 | 887159951 |
3043 | 255 | 279 | 5 | 882151167 |
8932 | 55 | 94 | 4 | 892683274 |
test.head()= test.rating y_true
Creating the model
import keras
= 8
n_latent_factors_user = 10
n_latent_factors_movie = 3
n_latent_factors_mf = len(dataset.user_id.unique()), len(dataset.item_id.unique())
n_users, n_movies
= keras.layers.Input(shape=[1],name='Item')
movie_input = keras.layers.Embedding(n_movies + 1, n_latent_factors_movie, name='Movie-Embedding-MLP')(movie_input)
movie_embedding_mlp = keras.layers.Flatten(name='FlattenMovies-MLP')(movie_embedding_mlp)
movie_vec_mlp = keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(movie_vec_mlp)
movie_vec_mlp
= keras.layers.Embedding(n_movies + 1, n_latent_factors_mf, name='Movie-Embedding-MF')(movie_input)
movie_embedding_mf = keras.layers.Flatten(name='FlattenMovies-MF')(movie_embedding_mf)
movie_vec_mf = keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(movie_vec_mf)
movie_vec_mf
= keras.layers.Input(shape=[1],name='User')
user_input = keras.layers.Flatten(name='FlattenUsers-MLP')(keras.layers.Embedding(n_users + 1, n_latent_factors_user,name='User-Embedding-MLP')(user_input))
user_vec_mlp = keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(user_vec_mlp)
user_vec_mlp
= keras.layers.Flatten(name='FlattenUsers-MF')(keras.layers.Embedding(n_users + 1, n_latent_factors_mf,name='User-Embedding-MF')(user_input))
user_vec_mf = keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(user_vec_mf)
user_vec_mf
= keras.layers.merge([movie_vec_mlp, user_vec_mlp], mode='concat',name='Concat')
concat = keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(concat)
concat_dropout = keras.layers.Dense(200,name='FullyConnected')(concat_dropout)
dense = keras.layers.BatchNormalization(name='Batch')(dense)
dense_batch = keras.layers.Dropout(0.2,name='Dropout-1')(dense_batch)
dropout_1 = keras.layers.Dense(100,name='FullyConnected-1')(dropout_1)
dense_2 = keras.layers.BatchNormalization(name='Batch-2')(dense_2)
dense_batch_2
= keras.layers.Dropout(0.2,name='Dropout-2')(dense_batch_2)
dropout_2 = keras.layers.Dense(50,name='FullyConnected-2')(dropout_2)
dense_3 = keras.layers.Dense(20,name='FullyConnected-3', activation='relu')(dense_3)
dense_4
= keras.layers.merge([movie_vec_mf, user_vec_mf], mode='dot',name='Dot')
pred_mf
= keras.layers.Dense(1, activation='relu',name='Activation')(dense_4)
pred_mlp
= keras.layers.merge([pred_mf, pred_mlp], mode='concat',name='Concat-MF-MLP')
combine_mlp_mf = keras.layers.Dense(100,name='Combine-MF-MLP')(combine_mlp_mf)
result_combine = keras.layers.Dense(100,name='FullyConnected-4')(result_combine)
deep_combine
= keras.layers.Dense(1,name='Prediction')(deep_combine)
result
= keras.Model([user_input, movie_input], result)
model = keras.optimizers.Adam(lr =0.01)
opt compile(optimizer='adam',loss= 'mean_absolute_error') model.
Using TensorFlow backend.
Let’s now see how our model looks like:
from IPython.display import SVG
from keras.utils.vis_utils import model_to_dot
=False, show_layer_names=True, rankdir='HB').create(prog='dot', format='svg')) SVG(model_to_dot(model, show_shapes
So, it wasn’t very complicated to set up. Courtesy Keras, we can do even more complex stuff!
model.summary()
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param # Connected to
==================================================================================================
Item (InputLayer) (None, 1) 0
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
User (InputLayer) (None, 1) 0
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Movie-Embedding-MLP (Embedding) (None, 1, 10) 16830 Item[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
User-Embedding-MLP (Embedding) (None, 1, 8) 7552 User[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FlattenMovies-MLP (Flatten) (None, 10) 0 Movie-Embedding-MLP[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FlattenUsers-MLP (Flatten) (None, 8) 0 User-Embedding-MLP[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dropout_1 (Dropout) (None, 10) 0 FlattenMovies-MLP[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dropout_3 (Dropout) (None, 8) 0 FlattenUsers-MLP[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Concat (Merge) (None, 18) 0 dropout_1[0][0]
dropout_3[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dropout_5 (Dropout) (None, 18) 0 Concat[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FullyConnected (Dense) (None, 200) 3800 dropout_5[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Batch (BatchNormalization) (None, 200) 800 FullyConnected[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dropout-1 (Dropout) (None, 200) 0 Batch[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FullyConnected-1 (Dense) (None, 100) 20100 Dropout-1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Batch-2 (BatchNormalization) (None, 100) 400 FullyConnected-1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Movie-Embedding-MF (Embedding) (None, 1, 3) 5049 Item[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
User-Embedding-MF (Embedding) (None, 1, 3) 2832 User[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dropout-2 (Dropout) (None, 100) 0 Batch-2[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FlattenMovies-MF (Flatten) (None, 3) 0 Movie-Embedding-MF[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FlattenUsers-MF (Flatten) (None, 3) 0 User-Embedding-MF[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FullyConnected-2 (Dense) (None, 50) 5050 Dropout-2[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dropout_2 (Dropout) (None, 3) 0 FlattenMovies-MF[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dropout_4 (Dropout) (None, 3) 0 FlattenUsers-MF[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FullyConnected-3 (Dense) (None, 20) 1020 FullyConnected-2[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dot (Merge) (None, 1) 0 dropout_2[0][0]
dropout_4[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Activation (Dense) (None, 1) 21 FullyConnected-3[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Concat-MF-MLP (Merge) (None, 2) 0 Dot[0][0]
Activation[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Combine-MF-MLP (Dense) (None, 100) 300 Concat-MF-MLP[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FullyConnected-4 (Dense) (None, 100) 10100 Combine-MF-MLP[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Prediction (Dense) (None, 1) 101 FullyConnected-4[0][0]
==================================================================================================
Total params: 73,955
Trainable params: 73,355
Non-trainable params: 600
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
We can see that the number of parameters is more than what we had in the Matrix Factorisation case. Let’s see how this model works. I’ll run it for more epochs given that we have more parameters.
= model.fit([train.user_id, train.item_id], train.rating, epochs=25, verbose=0, validation_split=0.1) history
Prediction performance of Neural Network based recommender system
from sklearn.metrics import mean_absolute_error
= np.round(model.predict([test.user_id, test.item_id]),0)
y_hat_2 print(mean_absolute_error(y_true, y_hat_2))
print(mean_absolute_error(y_true, model.predict([test.user_id, test.item_id])))
0.716
0.737380115688
Pretty similar to the result we got using matrix factorisation. This isn’t very optimised, and I am sure doing so, we can make this approach perform much better than GMF!
Thanks for reading. This post has been a good learning experience for me. Hope you enjoyed too!